JWT Decoder vs Verifier

JWT decoding and JWT verification solve different problems. Separating their roles speeds up 401/403 troubleshooting.

Role difference (check this first)

Symptom-first entry points

Recommended 401/403 flow

  1. 1) Read claims with Decoder (exp/nbf/aud/iss/scope)
  2. 2) Validate signature and key alignment with Verifier (alg/kid)
  3. 3) Use 401/403 guide to isolate HTTP header-side causes

Practical comparison axes

Inputs to collect before investigation

Operational playbook (short)

  1. 401 spike: check signature failure rate and kid mismatch in Verifier first
  2. 403 spike: inspect scope/role claim changes in Decoder
  3. Suspected timing issue: compare exp/nbf with server NTP sync status
  4. Prevention: standardize reason codes in logs for 401 and 403

Related tools

Common mistakes

Implementation checklist

FAQ

Is decoding claims enough for production checks?
No. Authenticity decisions require Verifier checks for signature, keys, and iss/aud.
What is the fastest check when Verifier fails?
Check alg/kid alignment, active keys, iss/aud, then exp/nbf with clock skew in that order.

Referenced specs

These links are generated from site_map rules in recommended diagnostic order.

  1. JWT Decoder — Decode and pretty-print JWT header/payload
  2. JWT Verifier — Verify JWT signatures (HS/RS/ES)
  3. JWT 401/403 Troubleshooting — Troubleshoot 401/403 auth failures from headers and JWT claims
  4. Authorization Inspect — Parse Authorization header formats
  5. WWW-Authenticate Inspect — Parse WWW-Authenticate challenges