Set-Cookie Conflict Checker

Diagnose unstable behavior from duplicate cookie names by visualizing Domain/Path/Secure combinations.

Status

Runs in your browser. No input is sent to a server. Useful for first-pass cookie conflict diagnostics.

How to use

Paste Set-Cookie lines, optionally set source URL and request URL, then run conflict check to inspect collisions and overwrite risks.

Notes (this tool)

  • Default Path depends on source URL. If missing, this tool assumes /.
  • Use dedicated tools for SameSite and browser third-party restrictions.

About this page

What does this tool do?

Parses multiple Set-Cookie lines and detects conflicts where same-name cookies differ by Domain or Path.

With a request URL, it estimates which cookies are sent and highlights likely collision cases.

Typical use cases

  • Login state changes across URL paths or subdomains
  • Multiple services reuse the same cookie name
  • Legacy Path or Domain cookies remain after migration

Detected conflict patterns

  • Overwrites caused by duplicate keys (name+domain+path)
  • Path variants of same name causing send-order dependency
  • Mixed Secure and non-Secure variants causing environment drift
  • Mixed host-only and Domain cookies increasing match complexity

What this tool does

  • Parse Set-Cookie syntax and list attributes
  • Warn about same-name conflicts and duplicate keys
  • Simulate send candidates for a specified request URL

Debugging workflow (recommended)

  • Paste all Set-Cookie lines from problematic responses
  • Set source URL and request URL, then run Analyze
  • Use conflict warnings to clean up Path/Domain strategy
  • Validate SameSite and security attributes with related tools

Operational notes

  • Default Path inference depends on source URL. When omitted, this tool assumes /.
  • Cookie send ordering can vary by browser implementation and is not guaranteed identical.

Referenced specs

  • RFC 6265 (HTTP Cookies)
  • MDN: Set-Cookie

FAQ

Should same-name cookies be fully prohibited?

It depends, but minimizing duplication and separating responsibility by domain/path is effective for stability.

Does every conflict warning mean a bug?

Not always, but it often indicates overwrite or ordering risks. Validate that behavior is truly intentional.

References

  1. RFC 6265 (HTTP Cookies)
  2. MDN: Set-Cookie

These links are generated from site_map rules in recommended diagnostic order.

  1. Set-Cookie Inspect — Parse Set-Cookie attributes and review delivery policy
  2. Cookie Domain/Path Matcher — Evaluate cookie send conditions by Domain/Path/Secure
  3. SameSite Cookie Simulator — Simulate cookie send behavior from SameSite and request context
  4. Cookie Security Audit — Audit Secure/HttpOnly/SameSite settings
  5. Cookie Size Checker — Estimate Cookie header size and check limit risks
  6. How to Diagnose Same-Name Cookie Collisions — Resolve unstable behavior by tracing same-name cookie path/domain variants, overwrite order, and send collisions
  7. How to Diagnose Set-Cookie Not Persisting — Isolate cookie persistence failures by checking Domain/Path/Secure/SameSite in order
  8. Cookie Incident Operational Checklist — Standardize response from triage to permanent fixes across storage failures, OAuth return issues, and same-name collisions

Response Header Diagnostics

Step through raw headers to inspect Retry-After, Server-Timing, Link, and Content-Type

Example

Set-Cookie: sid=app; Path=/; Secure
Set-Cookie: sid=admin; Path=/admin; Secure