X-Content-Type-Options Inspect

Diagnose X-Content-Type-Options in your browser and verify `nosniff` with invalid-value checks. No input is sent to a server.

Status

Runs in your browser. No input is sent to a server.

How to use

Paste X-Content-Type-Options and click “Parse” to evaluate nosniff and invalid tokens.

Notes (this tool)

  • Accepts full header lines and raw values.

About this page

What does this tool do?

Parse X-Content-Type-Options and check whether `nosniff` is correctly set.

Detect invalid or multiple values to verify MIME sniffing protection is configured as intended.

Typical use cases

  • Checking for missing `nosniff` during security-header audits
  • Troubleshooting inconsistent behavior around incorrect Content-Type settings
  • Verifying header transformations through CDN or reverse proxies

Core idea

  • `X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff` prevents browser MIME guessing.
  • It enforces stricter handling of server-declared Content-Type, reducing risk from mis-served resources.

Recommended workflow

  • Paste response headers and check for `nosniff`
  • If invalid/multiple values appear, inspect delivery layers (app/CDN)
  • Use with Content-Type Inspect to validate MIME declarations as well

Common pitfalls

  • Serving non-standard values while expecting nosniff protection
  • Duplicate headers making effective value unclear
  • Trying to rely on nosniff without fixing wrong Content-Type declarations

What this tool does

  • Determine whether nosniff is effectively present
  • Detect unknown/invalid tokens
  • Provide audit-friendly summary output

Operational notes

  • nosniff is not sufficient alone; combine with CSP and proper MIME delivery.
  • For static assets, correct extension-to-MIME mapping remains essential.

Referenced specs

  • MDN: X-Content-Type-Options
  • MIME Sniffing Standard

FAQ

What is the recommended value?

Typically `nosniff` only. Avoid variant or multiple values.

Is it unnecessary if Content-Type is correct?

It is commonly used as an extra defense layer and helps reduce impact from declaration mistakes.

References

  1. MDN: X-Content-Type-Options
  2. MIME Sniffing Standard

These links are generated from site_map rules in recommended diagnostic order.

  1. Content-Type Inspect — Parse Content-Type and inspect MIME/charset
  2. Security Headers Audit — Audit presence of major security headers
  3. Security Headers Fix Plan — Create a prioritized header-fix plan
  4. CSP Inspect — Parse and evaluate CSP directives
  5. Response Headers Parser — Parse response headers into structured data
  6. How to Diagnose JS/CSS Blocks from nosniff Mismatch — Trace Content-Type vs nosniff mismatches, fallback responses, and delivery-layer rewrites
  7. How to choose response header tools — Map Retry-After, Server-Timing, Link, Content-Type, and nosniff checks by symptom
  8. X-Frame-Options Inspect — Parse X-Frame-Options to validate clickjacking protection

Security Headers

Go from missing-header detection to concrete fix planning

Response Header Diagnostics

Step through raw headers to inspect Retry-After, Server-Timing, Link, and Content-Type

Example

X-Content-Type-Options: nosniff